In the spirit of www widening our palette of possibilities …
Thanks to Colossal.
In the spirit of www widening our palette of possibilities …
Thanks to Colossal.
Guardian asked authors about some of their favourite new titles this year. It would seem it has been a good year. Nice to see some less talked-about newcomers appear on the list as well, like Chavs by Owen Jones. Eric Hobsbawm’s choice, incidentally.










Which have you enjoyed most this year?

The name of the woman is Susan Kare. Looking at her sketchbooks brings tears to my eyes (as it should to every Mac aficionado that started with rainbow-filled apples).

It looks like doodles you would make at the back of high school math notebook, no?
(Of course, via Kottke)
PS
This is wonderfully complemented with a little video of Larry Tesler speaking about how they worked on developing Mac’s graphical user interface.

I would hand copies of Fahrenheit 451 and Animal Farm to NYPD. I would like to hear Obama says something.
Update, 20th November: Unfortunately, they do destroy books. And they do hurt people.

This short Boing Boing post got me madly furious in less than a second.
Luckily, here is Huffington Post update on what really happened.
And here is a picture of books stored in dry and safe place.
Let’s hope tents for people will be allowed. It’s getting cold out there.


Via Brain Pickings to this lovely illustrated book, new to our list. And to Sophie Blackall’s blog. Enjoy!
Richard Metzger from Dangerous Minds talks to great Alejandro Jodorowsky. It’s great. I warmly recommend all 32 minutes of it. And the thing is: “..it never ends.”

Today is our sixth birthday. This morning, when I walked in, this beautiful birthday cake was waiting on our front desk. (Hvala, Ana!)
Slavoj Žižek summarized his Zuccotti park address. The essay is different from the original speech. His attention focused on what is to be done. (via Dangerous Minds)
“But what do they want?” After all, this is the archetypal question addressed by a male master to a hysterical woman: “You whine and you complain, but do you know at all what you really want?” In the psychoanalytic sense, the protests effectively are a hysterical act, provoking the master, undermining his authority. And the question “But what do you want?” aims precisely to preclude the true answer — its real purpose is: “Tell it in my terms or shut up!”
The situation is like that of psychoanalysis, where the patient knows the answer (his symptoms are such answers) but doesn’t know what they are answers to, and it is up to the analyst to formulate the appropriate questions. We should treat the demands of the Wall Street protests in a similar way: Instead of wondering “What are they asking for? What are their demands and what are their proposed programs?”, intellectuals should see the Occupy protests as the answers for which we are not yet asking the right questions.

Started working on a new sign. Hope you will like it.

Please note our new opening hours. Thank you!